Fair Value Vs Historical Cost Essay Writing

Historical Cost Vs. Fair Value Essay

The basic purpose of accounting is to provide information that is useful to investors, creditors and others in making rational economic decisions. One accounting issue that has been debated on a lot is the historical cost method versus the fair value measurement. The historical cost method has been the basis of GAAP accounting for the past decade but has slowly been disappearing. Today it is starting to be replaced by the fair value method of accounting. When choosing a valuation method, it seems that there is a tradeoff between the two fundamental qualities of accounting theory which are relevance and reliability. In order for information to be relevant, it must also be reliable or faithful in its representation of events. This idea is also supported by FASB’s Conceptual Framework of Measurement. It states that for accounting information to be reliable it must be neutral. That means that is has to be unbiased and not chosen to favor a particular outcome.
Historical cost has been a mainstay of accounting largely because of its objectivity and reliability. Under this approach, assets are presented on the balance sheet at their value at the time of acquisition and are generally represented by their purchase cost. If those who make management and investment decisions had not found financial reports based on historical cost useful over the years, changes in accounting would long since have been made. In theory it is also less subject to manipulation and is based on the idea of making a profit (Cao, 2013).
An alternative valuation method to historical cost is the fair value method. The fair value method is “the practice of measuring assets and liabilities at estimates of their current value (Jordan, Clark, & Pate, 2013).” While the historical cost method is conservative and reliable, measuring at fair value makes accounting information more relevant. FASB has already been making stride towards modernizing GAAP and is working toward having all financial assets and liabilities recognized in statements of financial position at their fair values, rather than at amounts based on their historical cost (“Historical Cost Vs. Current Cost,” 2001). As an example, GAAP and IFRS are currently using fair value extensively in accounts concerning derivatives and hedges, employee stock options, financial assets, and goodwill impairment testing (Jordan, Clark, & Pate, 2013).
When deciding if the historical cost method should be abandoned or modified for a more current cost system, it is important to note the complexity of financial instruments used today and the risk management strategies that make yesterday’s prices obsolete. Looking at the historical cost...

Loading: Checking Spelling


Read more

Usefulness and Reliability of Information Provided By Corporations

1685 words - 7 pages An ongoing concern in financial reporting is the usefulness and reliability of information provided by corporations. The financial accounting standard board defines usefulness as the information that is useful for the users in decision making (FASB, 2011). Reliability is inferred when the information is verified, objective, and can be relied on. Therefore, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 standardizes the valuation and...

Solving the Foreclosure Crisis Essay

1877 words - 8 pages I. Introduction The current financial crisis was triggered by subprime mortgage in the United States. This lead not only to a large amount of mortgage default but also other problem suc as, credit card and store loans. The result was huge losses in financial institution in the United States Europe and Asia, because of financial liberalization had enabled the transnational transaction of “bad” assets. Some people argue that this crisis was...

Asset Measurement, and Accounting Policies and Standards

1073 words - 4 pages If we look at a reporting entity's balance sheet we will see a total given for all the entity's assets (this is a requirement of AASB101). This aggregate total is derived by adding together the various classes of current and non-current assets. Do you think it is appropriate that the various classes of assets are simply added together, even though they have...


1322 words - 5 pages AbstractThis paper explores the differences between the International Financial Reporting Standards and Generally Accepted Accounting Principals that all companies use to prepare financial statements. Now more than ever companies feel the need to be more globalized and expand into different markets...

Weiner Chronicles

649 words - 3 pages WACC = (E/V) * RE + (P/V) * RP + (D/V) * RD * (1 - TC)1st assumption: uses current market costs not historical2nd assumption: uses market weights not historical, target proportions over actual, p.197,83rd assumption: cost of debt should be after corporate taxSurvey FindingsDCF is the dominant evaluation techniqueWACC is the dominant discount rate used in DCF analyses

Goodwill Impairment

1531 words - 6 pages Executive SummaryGoodwill impairment reporting in Canada and U.S. is similar except for the reporting of negative goodwill and the processes that take place to calculate the goodwill.The impact of amortization of goodwill versus its write-off can be shown by comparing them to each other and by showing how useful they are to investors. Goodwill amortization smoothes the earnings of the entities whereas write-off...

Retrospect of Random

659 words - 3 pages International Financial Reporting Standards Introduction to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)1 Canadian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) are now set by the Canadian Accounting Standards Board (AcSB), an independent body with the authority to develop and establish...


8738 words - 35 pages FF6116 - FINANCIAL MODELING Financial Modeling Project 1 BUERBERRY, HUGO BOSS & HERMES Group 10 CAO JIE KANG TIANYI WANG YIDONG YU TIANYUAN YUAN YE 5/20/2012 1 Executive Summary This report is to use financial modeling technic to evaluate the stock price of BURBERRY, HUGO BOSS and HERMES. Firstly, our analysis begin with a review of Luxury Apparels and...

Credit Crunch

1561 words - 6 pages When fair value accounting was first brought in by the International Accounting Standards Boards a few years ago, there were some concerns about the volatility it would bring, but in an optimistic economy it made company figures look good and the matter was left alone. However with a credit crunch in full swing, the matter has again been brought up as figures fall dramatically. Companies, regulators and politicians are all attacking the...

Definition of depreciation, facts and causes.

636 words - 3 pages The word 'Depreciation' has been derived from the Latin word 'Depretium' which means 'decline in price' or 'value'. Depreciation relates to fixed assets which loose value on account of usage. Therefore 'Depreciation' means decline in value of fixed assets on account of...

The Differences Between the GAAP and the IFRS Accounting Systems

1239 words - 5 pages In the world of international finance there are two major accounting systems; GAAP, which stands for Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, and IFRS, which stands for International Financial Reporting Standards. The United States prefers GAAP while the European market, as well as many other countries, prefers IFRS. By 2015 the Securities Exchange Commission is anticipating a total transfer to IFRS in the United States. Though the differences...

Essay: How Fair is Fair Value?

Accounting across the world has been undergoing massive changes over the past two years with the introduction ofInternational Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). These standards seek to bring the financial statements of companies all over the world into line so that comparison of performance and financial positions can be compared and contrasted straightforwardly allowing the users of accounts to make greater informed management performance evaluations assess enterprise and make sound investment decisions.

One of the greatest changes being implemented is that of financial reporting measurements. Traditionally historic cost has been the measurement used when valuing assets, however new International Standards are moving companies towards fair value measurement. This has lead to a growing controversy surrounding the question of financial reporting measurement and has caused people to ask the question how fair is fair value?This essay aimsto discuss measurements traditionally used (historic cost) and the now primary measurement of fair value and evaluating the impact this will have on financial statements and their users.

This raises the question does the fair value measurement of assets and liabilities follow the general rules accepted for financial statements to be useful?

Perhaps the most important of the four general rules, as stated by the IASB, are understandability, relevance, reliability and comparability. In order to evaluate if fair value is a suitable primary financial reporting measure and a fair one these rules must be examined.

In the case ofreliability those that argue against fair value suggest that it is an unreliable measurement due to the fact that the information is not based on an arms length transaction. If the information is unreliable then it must surely be unfair to use this as a measurement in the financial statements. The information can also be seen to be unreliable in the case of hypothetical markets for fair value measurement, where there is room for manipulation of figures by management due to different hypotheses.

Relevance is also impacted upon by these hypothetical calculations of fair value of assets. In basic terms they are estimations, which will have a varying degree of accuracy and may therefore not be relevant. However, the argument here is that, compared to historic cost, fair value does offer more relevance as the accounts will be more up-to-date, consider for instance the extreme rising prices of buildings. There is also a case that as a result of fair value measurement accounts will be more volatile, however this may better reflect the economic reality. This then leads us on to the debate of relevance versus reliability.

Is the fact that fair value measurements are more relevant, more important than the fact that they may be unreliable compared to that of the traditional historic cost accounting? Colleen Cunningham CEO of Financial Executives International may have answered this in "Fair Value Accounting: Fair for Whom?" (Financial Executive, March/April 2004):

"Relevant information that is unreliable is useless to an investor. We must, therefore, be clear about the nature of the claim being made for an accounting number described as reliable."

Although there is an argument against decisions based on reliable but largely irrelevant information provided by historical cost accounting it must be pointed out that investors and other users of accounts have always used this method and for this reason it is understood and comparable. This may not be the case for fair value measurements which are still going through a transition period for this reason the standards are somewhat unclear on certain items and practices are being constantly added to and changed. This has fuelled the argument, as it has led to a poor understanding of financial statements, and with what appears to be estimations in some fair value measurements, a lack of comparability.

So what should standard setters do and is fair value fair?I think the answer here is no, it is not fair. It offers the chance for companies to make speculative gains through working to a mathematical speculative future it is this type of risk that makes fair value unreliable and therefore in my opinion unfair. Although fair value appears to be more relevant in the relevance versus reliability debate it would seem that for users of accounts reliability is more important. Also the fact that fair value does not meet the 'cornerstones' of accounting practice as set out by the IASB would suggest it should not be a primary financial reporting measurement.

New Fair Value Standards Stress How not Just What [journal], William M. Sinnett, Jan/Feb 2007

One thought on “Fair Value Vs Historical Cost Essay Writing

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *